Most Favored Nation (or Give It To Them, Gotta Give It To Me, Too)

By:

In international trade, having a most favored nation agreement means that your country will receive trade terms on par with the most favorable terms offered to another country.

When it comes to performing arts the term is applied in a similar manner. The term Most Favored Nation (MFN) appears most frequently in connection with performance rights for songs.

Entertainment lawyer Gordon Firemark recently posted a video on the subject:

“When you see that a deal point is treated on a Most Favored Nations basis, it means that No other deal (of its kind) will contain more favorable terms than the one in question, and if any other deal DOES include more favorable terms, then all such deals will be “upgraded” to those better terms. Essentially, parties are hedging their bets that someone else could negotiate a better deal, and everybody would benefit.”

Most Favored Nation

This is an important status of which to be aware. Way back when I was doing my arts administration internship, I was assigned with researching who held the rights to certain songs and contacting them to find out how much the rights would be. When I presented the total cost, everyone was happy because it came in under budget.

Then the managing director looked at the contracts and pointed out that due to the MFN clauses all the songs that were $85-$100 a performance would actually be $150 since that was the highest price quoted for one of the songs. I had to go back and ask if some of the rights holders would accept less than they originally quoted. (I made those numbers up by the way.)

More importantly, many contracts have most favored nations language but never use that phrase at all. For example, a contract may stipulate that a performer be listed no less equally than another in advertising. The same may hold true for dressing rooms, hotel rooms and other hospitality arrangements.

Sponsors may require the same consideration as part of their sponsorship arrangements. If someone who sponsoring in the same bracket as they are gets better treatment, they must receive the same treatment. You need to pay attention if the committee/staff soliciting sponsorships is taking a flexible approach category parameters in order to secure a sponsorship.

It is one thing to promise a larger font or logo size when listing a sponsor, but it can get costly if promising tickets to one company to land their sponsorship means you have to provide the same benefit to others by virtue of an equal treatment clause.

About Joe Patti

In addition to writing for ArtHacker, I have been writing the blog, Butts in the Seats (buttsseats.com) since 2004.
I am also an evangelist for the effort to Build Public Will For Arts and Culture being helmed by Arts Midwest and the Metropolitan Group. (http://www.creatingconnection.org/about/)
I am currently the Director of the Vern Riffe Center for the Arts at Shawnee State University. Across my career I have worked at University of Hawaii-Leeward Community College, University of Central Florida, Asolo Theater, Utah Shakespearean Festival, Appel Farm Arts and Music Center and numerous other places both defunct and funky.

Don't Stop Hacking The Arts Yet...

  • Wait!

    In March 2014, President Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum directing the Department of Labor to update the minimum wage and overtime standards. These new standards were supposed to go…

  • MOU vs Contracts

    Non-profit organizations frequently enter into memorandum of understanding (MOU) relationships so it is important to understand the difference between them and contracts. In simple terms, an MOU is generally…

1 thought on “Most Favored Nation (or Give It To Them, Gotta Give It To Me, Too)”

Leave a Comment

Send this to a friend